<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Joy of Setup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joyofsetup.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joyofsetup.com</link>
	<description>Bob Arnson's blog about setup and servicing</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 20:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Chrome setup by Leon Zandman</title>
		<link>http://www.joyofsetup.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-setup/#comment-7159</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon Zandman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 19:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joyofsetup.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-setup/#comment-7159</guid>
		<description>Talking about low-impact setup: Just recently I bought and installed the &lt;a href="http://www.x-plane.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;X-Plane&lt;/a&gt; flight simulator as an alternative to MS Flight Simulator. I was amazed its default installation location is the user's desktop! Also the installer doesn't create any desktop or start menu shortcuts. It turns out they want X-Plane to have an low-impact setup. Because of all the problems with installing to the Program Files directory the decided on using the desktop. And creating no shortcuts and not using the registry also makes the uninstall a breeze:just delete the X-Plane installation directory. Very simple, but I like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talking about low-impact setup: Just recently I bought and installed the <a href="http://www.x-plane.com/" rel="nofollow">X-Plane</a> flight simulator as an alternative to MS Flight Simulator. I was amazed its default installation location is the user&#8217;s desktop! Also the installer doesn&#8217;t create any desktop or start menu shortcuts. It turns out they want X-Plane to have an low-impact setup. Because of all the problems with installing to the Program Files directory the decided on using the desktop. And creating no shortcuts and not using the registry also makes the uninstall a breeze:just delete the X-Plane installation directory. Very simple, but I like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Chrome setup by George Toms</title>
		<link>http://www.joyofsetup.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-setup/#comment-7155</link>
		<dc:creator>George Toms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joyofsetup.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-setup/#comment-7155</guid>
		<description>Google Chrome is really fast!

Now I can sort 200,000 records inside of Browser (Chrome) just in 1 sec. (Faster than Microsoft Excel):

http://www.ardentedge.com/ex_if.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Chrome is really fast!</p>
<p>Now I can sort 200,000 records inside of Browser (Chrome) just in 1 sec. (Faster than Microsoft Excel):</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ardentedge.com/ex_if.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.ardentedge.com/ex_if.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Chrome setup by crazyburns</title>
		<link>http://www.joyofsetup.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-setup/#comment-7152</link>
		<dc:creator>crazyburns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 05:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joyofsetup.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-setup/#comment-7152</guid>
		<description>The per user install is extremely stupid.  I run multiple user on my home computer, so it means that Chrome has to be installed separately for each user.  At 80 MB it's not large, but with 5 user that's over 400 MB of drive space for a 80 MB app.

Also for a corporate environment it make deploying the software a nightmare.  Instead of installing the app once on 5,000+ machines you now have to install it dozens of times per 5,000+ machines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The per user install is extremely stupid.  I run multiple user on my home computer, so it means that Chrome has to be installed separately for each user.  At 80 MB it&#8217;s not large, but with 5 user that&#8217;s over 400 MB of drive space for a 80 MB app.</p>
<p>Also for a corporate environment it make deploying the software a nightmare.  Instead of installing the app once on 5,000+ machines you now have to install it dozens of times per 5,000+ machines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Chrome setup by LukeB</title>
		<link>http://www.joyofsetup.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-setup/#comment-7150</link>
		<dc:creator>LukeB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joyofsetup.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-setup/#comment-7150</guid>
		<description>The per-user install was the first thing I noticed since I run as a normal user on XP.

I'm a fan of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The per-user install was the first thing I noticed since I run as a normal user on XP.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a fan of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Chrome setup by Brent Powers</title>
		<link>http://www.joyofsetup.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-setup/#comment-7149</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Powers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 17:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joyofsetup.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-setup/#comment-7149</guid>
		<description>I'm stunned at a couple of things. 

First, I see nothing that isn't already in Opera, other than --

Second, Google's desire, ability, and intent to track all characters typed with IP frightens the hell out of me.

Third - the thing's an abomination in a corporate environment. Beta software? on non-priveleged users machines? Skype also did the per user install, and then there was a skype per use virus. Skype is blocked in our environment now. I'm not yet sure how we're going to block this abomination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m stunned at a couple of things. </p>
<p>First, I see nothing that isn&#8217;t already in Opera, other than &#8211;</p>
<p>Second, Google&#8217;s desire, ability, and intent to track all characters typed with IP frightens the hell out of me.</p>
<p>Third - the thing&#8217;s an abomination in a corporate environment. Beta software? on non-priveleged users machines? Skype also did the per user install, and then there was a skype per use virus. Skype is blocked in our environment now. I&#8217;m not yet sure how we&#8217;re going to block this abomination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Chrome setup by Colby Ringeisen</title>
		<link>http://www.joyofsetup.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-setup/#comment-7148</link>
		<dc:creator>Colby Ringeisen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 17:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joyofsetup.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-setup/#comment-7148</guid>
		<description>My company has banned Chromium from corporate computers due to the draconian EULA which gives Google too much authority over content created in the browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My company has banned Chromium from corporate computers due to the draconian EULA which gives Google too much authority over content created in the browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Verbose logging from WcaUtil by Neil Sleightholm</title>
		<link>http://www.joyofsetup.com/2008/07/15/verbose-logging-from-wcautil/#comment-7147</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Sleightholm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 11:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joyofsetup.com/2008/07/15/verbose-logging-from-wcautil/#comment-7147</guid>
		<description>Bug reported: Id=642714</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bug reported: Id=642714</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Highlights of WiX v3.0.4429.0 by Erik</title>
		<link>http://www.joyofsetup.com/2008/08/30/highlights-of-wix-v3044290/#comment-7146</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 06:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joyofsetup.com/2008/08/30/highlights-of-wix-v3044290/#comment-7146</guid>
		<description>I have created a bug (2092594) and assigned it to you. I hope you can squeeze a fix into the release this Friday ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have created a bug (2092594) and assigned it to you. I hope you can squeeze a fix into the release this Friday <img src='http://www.joyofsetup.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Highlights of WiX v3.0.4429.0 by Bob Arnson</title>
		<link>http://www.joyofsetup.com/2008/08/30/highlights-of-wix-v3044290/#comment-7145</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Arnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 03:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joyofsetup.com/2008/08/30/highlights-of-wix-v3044290/#comment-7145</guid>
		<description>Erik,

I can see only the first frame of that video. Can you open a bug and attach a verbose log?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erik,</p>
<p>I can see only the first frame of that video. Can you open a bug and attach a verbose log?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Verbose logging from WcaUtil by Bob Arnson</title>
		<link>http://www.joyofsetup.com/2008/07/15/verbose-logging-from-wcautil/#comment-7144</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Arnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 03:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joyofsetup.com/2008/07/15/verbose-logging-from-wcautil/#comment-7144</guid>
		<description>Bummer. OK, please feel free to file a bug; I can't promise to look at it this week (lots of other stuff going on) but I don't want to conveniently forget about it!&lt;g&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bummer. OK, please feel free to file a bug; I can&#8217;t promise to look at it this week (lots of other stuff going on) but I don&#8217;t want to conveniently forget about it!<g></g></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.479 seconds -->
